Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Cabo Verde
66.5%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
100.0%
in 2025
Cabo Verde rank
3rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
5th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 100.0% against 66.5% in Cabo Verde, a difference of 33.5%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 3rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th of 22 groups.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.7% | 100.0% | 56.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 65.1% | 100.0% | 34.9% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 66.5% | 100.0% | 33.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Cabo Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 100.0% against 66.5% in Cabo Verde as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 33.5%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Cabo Verde ranks 3rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 5th of 22 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.