Cayman Islands vs South Sudan: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Cayman Islands
32.5%
in 2025
South Sudan
33.6%
in 2025
Cayman Islands rank
174th
South Sudan rank
172nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Cayman Islands
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 33.6% against 32.5% in Cayman Islands, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 172nd of 253 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.6% | 31.3% | 0.3% | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 32.2% | 33.6% | 1.4% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 32.5% | 33.6% | 1.1% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Cayman Islands or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 33.6% against 32.5% in Cayman Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Cayman Islands and South Sudan?
- 1.1%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and South Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cayman Islands and South Sudan rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Cayman Islands ranks 174th and South Sudan ranks 172nd of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.