Chad vs Nicaragua: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Chad
65.3%
in 2025
Nicaragua
67.9%
in 2025
Chad rank
59th
Nicaragua rank
56th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Chad
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 67.9% against 65.3% in Chad, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 59th and Nicaragua ranks 56th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.3% | 65.1% | 0.2% | Chad |
| 2010s | 65.3% | 67.5% | 2.2% | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 65.3% | 67.9% | 2.7% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Chad or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 67.9% against 65.3% in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Chad and Nicaragua?
- 2.6%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nicaragua?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Nicaragua rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Chad ranks 59th and Nicaragua ranks 56th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.