Chile vs Gibraltar: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Chile
33.3%
in 2025
Gibraltar
31.9%
in 2025
Chile rank
153rd
Gibraltar rank
156th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Chile
- Gibraltar
How they compare
Chile currently reports 33.3% against 31.9% in Gibraltar, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 153rd and Gibraltar ranks 156th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Gibraltar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Gibraltar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.8% | 16.1% | 5.6% | Chile |
| 2010s | 25.9% | 31.9% | 5.9% | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 31.5% | 31.9% | 0.4% | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Chile or Gibraltar?
- Chile, at 33.3% against 31.9% in Gibraltar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Chile and Gibraltar?
- 1.4%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Gibraltar?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Gibraltar rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Chile ranks 153rd and Gibraltar ranks 156th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.