Chile vs South Sudan: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Chile
33.3%
in 2025
South Sudan
33.6%
in 2025
Chile rank
153rd
South Sudan rank
152nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 33.6% against 33.3% in Chile, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 153rd and South Sudan ranks 152nd of 222 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.8% | 31.3% | 9.6% | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 25.9% | 33.6% | 7.7% | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 31.5% | 33.6% | 2.1% | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Chile or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 33.6% against 33.3% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Chile and South Sudan?
- 0.3%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Chile ranks 153rd and South Sudan ranks 152nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.