Chile vs Trinidad and Tobago: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Chile
33.3%
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
32.0%
in 2025
Chile rank
173rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
176th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Chile
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Chile currently reports 33.3% against 32.0% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Chile ranks 173rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 176th of 253 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.8% | 32.0% | 10.2% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 25.9% | 32.0% | 6.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 31.5% | 32.0% | 0.5% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Chile or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Chile, at 33.3% against 32.0% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Chile and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.3%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Chile ranks 173rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 176th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.