Christmas Island vs Jersey: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Christmas Island
63.0%
in 2025
Jersey
64.1%
in 2025
Christmas Island rank
65th
Jersey rank
62nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Christmas Island
- Jersey
How they compare
Jersey currently reports 64.1% against 63.0% in Christmas Island, a difference of 1.1%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Jersey has been ahead every year.
Christmas Island ranks 65th and Jersey ranks 62nd of 222 countries.
Jersey has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Christmas Island | Jersey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.9% | 64.1% | 1.2% | Jersey |
| 2010s | 62.9% | 64.1% | 1.2% | Jersey |
| 2020s | 63.0% | 64.1% | 1.1% | Jersey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Christmas Island or Jersey?
- Jersey, at 64.1% against 63.0% in Christmas Island as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Christmas Island and Jersey?
- 1.1%, with Jersey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Christmas Island and Jersey?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Christmas Island and Jersey rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Christmas Island ranks 65th and Jersey ranks 62nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.