Christmas Island vs Montenegro: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Christmas Island
63.0%
in 2025
Montenegro
63.1%
in 2025
Christmas Island rank
73rd
Montenegro rank
72nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Christmas Island
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 63.1% against 63.0% in Christmas Island, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Christmas Island ahead.
Christmas Island ranks 73rd and Montenegro ranks 72nd of 253 countries.
Christmas Island has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Christmas Island | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.9% | 38.6% | 24.3% | Christmas Island |
| 2010s | 62.9% | 44.8% | 18.1% | Christmas Island |
| 2020s | 63.0% | 61.6% | 1.4% | Christmas Island |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Christmas Island or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 63.1% against 63.0% in Christmas Island as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Christmas Island and Montenegro?
- 0.1%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Christmas Island and Montenegro?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Christmas Island and Montenegro rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Christmas Island ranks 73rd and Montenegro ranks 72nd of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.