Comoros vs Pitcairn: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Comoros
57.4%
in 2025
Pitcairn
57.2%
in 2025
Comoros rank
83rd
Pitcairn rank
85th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Comoros
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 57.4% against 57.2% in Pitcairn, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Pitcairn ahead.
Comoros ranks 83rd and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 16.3% | 16.3% | Pitcairn |
| 2010s | 57.4% | 32.7% | 24.7% | Comoros |
| 2020s | 57.4% | 57.2% | 0.2% | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Comoros or Pitcairn?
- Comoros, at 57.4% against 57.2% in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Comoros and Pitcairn?
- 0.2%, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Pitcairn?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Pitcairn rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Comoros ranks 83rd and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.