Congo vs Sweden: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Congo
57.4%
in 2025
Sweden
57.6%
in 2025
Congo rank
82nd
Sweden rank
80th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Congo
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 57.6% against 57.4% in Congo, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 80th of 222 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.7% | 53.2% | 25.5% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 43.9% | 56.5% | 12.6% | Sweden |
| 2020s | 53.4% | 57.5% | 4.2% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Congo or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 57.6% against 57.4% in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Congo and Sweden?
- 0.2%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Sweden rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Congo ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 80th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.