Cote d'Ivoire vs Finland: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Cote d'Ivoire
74.2%
in 2025
Finland
71.7%
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
52nd
Finland rank
55th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Finland
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 74.2% against 71.7% in Finland, a difference of 2.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 52nd and Finland ranks 55th of 253 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.1% | 64.8% | 3.7% | Finland |
| 2010s | 61.6% | 70.2% | 8.6% | Finland |
| 2020s | 71.1% | 71.7% | 0.6% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Cote d'Ivoire or Finland?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 74.2% against 71.7% in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Cote d'Ivoire and Finland?
- 2.5%, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Finland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Finland rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 52nd and Finland ranks 55th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.