Croatia vs Namibia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Croatia
82.0%
in 2025
Namibia
82.0%
in 2025
Croatia rank
33rd
Namibia rank
32nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 82.0% against 82.0% in Croatia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 222 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.0% | 43.1% | 20.1% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 64.4% | 81.5% | 17.1% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 81.7% | 82.0% | 0.3% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Croatia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 82.0% against 82.0% in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Croatia and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Croatia ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.