Curacao vs Greenland: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Curacao
30.2%
in 2025
Greenland
29.6%
in 2025
Curacao rank
182nd
Greenland rank
185th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Curacao
- Greenland
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Greenland ahead.
Curacao ranks 182nd and Greenland ranks 185th of 254 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.3% | 26.2% | 21.0% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 19.3% | 29.2% | 10.0% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 30.2% | 29.6% | 0.7% | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Curacao or Greenland?
- Curacao, at 30.2% against 29.6% in Greenland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Curacao and Greenland?
- 0.6%, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Greenland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Curacao and Greenland rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Curacao ranks 182nd and Greenland ranks 185th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.