Czechia vs Estonia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Czechia
94.8%
in 2025
Estonia
94.9%
in 2025
Czechia rank
14th
Estonia rank
13th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Czechia
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 94.9% against 94.8% in Czechia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 14th and Estonia ranks 13th of 222 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.9% | 72.5% | 0.6% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 94.3% | 94.8% | 0.5% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 94.8% | 94.9% | 0.1% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Czechia or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 94.9% against 94.8% in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Czechia and Estonia?
- 0.1%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Estonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Estonia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Czechia ranks 14th and Estonia ranks 13th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.