Egypt vs Kiribati: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Egypt
38.7%
in 2025
Kiribati
40.0%
in 2025
Egypt rank
137th
Kiribati rank
134th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Egypt
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 40.0% against 38.7% in Egypt, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 137th and Kiribati ranks 134th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.4% | 16.0% | 19.4% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 38.7% | 40.0% | 1.3% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 38.7% | 40.0% | 1.3% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Egypt or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 40.0% against 38.7% in Egypt as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Egypt and Kiribati?
- 1.3%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kiribati?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Kiribati rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Egypt ranks 137th and Kiribati ranks 134th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.