Egypt vs Rwanda: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Egypt
38.7%
in 2025
Rwanda
37.1%
in 2025
Egypt rank
137th
Rwanda rank
140th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Egypt
- Rwanda
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 38.7% against 37.1% in Rwanda, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 140th of 222 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.4% | 30.4% | 5.0% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 38.7% | 34.0% | 4.7% | Egypt |
| 2020s | 38.7% | 36.3% | 2.5% | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Egypt or Rwanda?
- Egypt, at 38.7% against 37.1% in Rwanda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Egypt and Rwanda?
- 1.6%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Egypt and Rwanda rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Egypt ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 140th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.