El Salvador vs Greenland: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
El Salvador
28.0%
in 2025
Greenland
29.6%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
187th
Greenland rank
185th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- El Salvador
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 29.6% against 28.0% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 187th and Greenland ranks 185th of 253 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.3% | 26.2% | 19.9% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 26.4% | 29.2% | 2.8% | Greenland |
| 2020s | 28.0% | 29.6% | 1.5% | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), El Salvador or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 29.6% against 28.0% in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between El Salvador and Greenland?
- 1.6%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Greenland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Greenland rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- El Salvador ranks 187th and Greenland ranks 185th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.