El Salvador vs Isle of Man: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
El Salvador
28.0%
in 2025
Isle of Man
27.4%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
187th
Isle of Man rank
189th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- El Salvador
- Isle of Man
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 28.0% against 27.4% in Isle of Man, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Isle of Man ahead.
El Salvador ranks 187th and Isle of Man ranks 189th of 253 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Isle of Man in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Isle of Man | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.3% | 9.9% | 3.5% | Isle of Man |
| 2010s | 26.4% | 21.0% | 5.4% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 28.0% | 27.2% | 0.8% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), El Salvador or Isle of Man?
- El Salvador, at 28.0% against 27.4% in Isle of Man as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between El Salvador and Isle of Man?
- 0.6%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Isle of Man?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Isle of Man rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- El Salvador ranks 187th and Isle of Man ranks 189th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.