Estonia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

Estonia
94.9%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
41.6%
in 2025
Estonia rank
13th
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
8th

Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time

  • Estonia
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 94.9% against 41.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 53.3%.

That makes Estonia's figure about 2.3 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 13th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 222 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 72.5% 33.7% 38.8% Estonia
2010s 94.8% 38.6% 56.2% Estonia
2020s 94.9% 41.4% 53.5% Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Estonia or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Estonia, at 94.9% against 41.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Estonia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
53.3%, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Estonia and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
Estonia ranks 13th and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/estonia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/estonia/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Estonia vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
263 places, 6,838 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed