Estonia vs Lithuania: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Estonia
94.9%
in 2025
Lithuania
92.5%
in 2025
Estonia rank
13th
Lithuania rank
16th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Estonia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 94.9% against 92.5% in Lithuania, a difference of 2.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Estonia ranks 13th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 222 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.5% | 66.7% | 5.8% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 94.8% | 85.6% | 9.1% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 94.9% | 90.5% | 4.4% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Estonia or Lithuania?
- Estonia, at 94.9% against 92.5% in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Estonia and Lithuania?
- 2.4%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Lithuania rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Estonia ranks 13th and Lithuania ranks 16th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.