Estonia vs Oceania: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Estonia
94.9%
in 2025
Oceania
35.8%
in 2025
Estonia rank
13th
Oceania rank
13th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Estonia
- Oceania
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 94.9% against 35.8% in Oceania, a difference of 59.1%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 2.6 times Oceania's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 13th and Oceania ranks 13th of 222 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.5% | 24.7% | 47.8% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 94.8% | 32.7% | 62.0% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 94.9% | 35.7% | 59.2% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Estonia or Oceania?
- Estonia, at 94.9% against 35.8% in Oceania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Estonia and Oceania?
- 59.1%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Oceania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Oceania rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Estonia ranks 13th and Oceania ranks 13th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.