Estonia vs Timor-Leste: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Estonia
94.9%
in 2025
Timor-Leste
45.6%
in 2025
Estonia rank
13th
Timor-Leste rank
6th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Estonia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 94.9% against 45.6% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 49.3%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 2.1 times Timor-Leste's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 13th and Timor-Leste ranks 6th of 222 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.5% | 19.9% | 52.6% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 94.8% | 42.6% | 52.1% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 94.9% | 45.6% | 49.3% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Estonia or Timor-Leste?
- Estonia, at 94.9% against 45.6% in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Estonia and Timor-Leste?
- 49.3%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Timor-Leste?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Timor-Leste rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Estonia ranks 13th and Timor-Leste ranks 6th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.