Eswatini vs Falkland Islands (Malvinas): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Eswatini
22.7%
in 2025
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
20.8%
in 2025
Eswatini rank
203rd
Falkland Islands (Malvinas) rank
206th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Eswatini
- Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 22.7% against 20.8% in Falkland Islands (Malvinas), a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Falkland Islands (Malvinas)'s.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 203rd and Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 206th of 253 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Falkland Islands (Malvinas) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.9% | 20.2% | 0.7% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 21.1% | 20.8% | 0.3% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 22.7% | 20.8% | 1.9% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Eswatini or Falkland Islands (Malvinas)?
- Eswatini, at 22.7% against 20.8% in Falkland Islands (Malvinas) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Eswatini and Falkland Islands (Malvinas)?
- 1.9%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Falkland Islands (Malvinas)?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Falkland Islands (Malvinas) rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Eswatini ranks 203rd and Falkland Islands (Malvinas) ranks 206th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.