Finland vs Malawi: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Finland
71.7%
in 2025
Malawi
71.4%
in 2025
Finland rank
49th
Malawi rank
50th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Finland
- Malawi
How they compare
Finland currently reports 71.7% against 71.4% in Malawi, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Finland ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 50th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.8% | 68.2% | 3.4% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 70.2% | 69.2% | 1.0% | Finland |
| 2020s | 71.7% | 71.4% | 0.3% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Finland or Malawi?
- Finland, at 71.7% against 71.4% in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Finland and Malawi?
- 0.3%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Malawi rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Finland ranks 49th and Malawi ranks 50th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.