French Guiana vs Namibia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
French Guiana
83.2%
in 2025
Namibia
82.0%
in 2025
French Guiana rank
29th
Namibia rank
32nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- French Guiana
- Namibia
How they compare
French Guiana currently reports 83.2% against 82.0% in Namibia, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was French Guiana ahead.
French Guiana ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 222 countries.
French Guiana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Guiana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.4% | 43.1% | 25.3% | French Guiana |
| 2010s | 81.8% | 81.5% | 0.3% | French Guiana |
| 2020s | 83.2% | 82.0% | 1.2% | French Guiana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), French Guiana or Namibia?
- French Guiana, at 83.2% against 82.0% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between French Guiana and Namibia?
- 1.2%, with French Guiana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do French Guiana and Namibia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- French Guiana ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 32nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.