French Guiana vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
French Guiana
83.2%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
85.1%
in 2025
French Guiana rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- French Guiana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 85.1% against 83.2% in French Guiana, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
French Guiana ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 222 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Guiana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.4% | 77.3% | 8.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 81.8% | 83.6% | 1.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 83.2% | 85.1% | 1.9% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), French Guiana or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 85.1% against 83.2% in French Guiana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between French Guiana and Zimbabwe?
- 1.9%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Guiana and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do French Guiana and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- French Guiana ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.