French Polynesia vs Mauritius: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
French Polynesia
8.6%
in 2025
Mauritius
10.0%
in 2025
French Polynesia rank
202nd
Mauritius rank
200th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- French Polynesia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 10.0% against 8.6% in French Polynesia, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times French Polynesia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 202nd and Mauritius ranks 200th of 222 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.6% | 9.1% | 3.5% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 6.8% | 10.0% | 3.1% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 8.6% | 10.0% | 1.4% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), French Polynesia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 10.0% against 8.6% in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between French Polynesia and Mauritius?
- 1.4%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and Mauritius rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- French Polynesia ranks 202nd and Mauritius ranks 200th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.