Ghana vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

Ghana
86.0%
in 2025
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
16.9%
in 2025
Ghana rank
25th
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
23rd

Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time

  • Ghana
  • Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
020406080200020122025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 86.0% against 16.9% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 69.1%.

That makes Ghana's figure about 5.1 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 25th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd of 253 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) Difference Ahead
2000s 85.4% 9.2% 76.2% Ghana
2010s 86.0% 15.4% 70.6% Ghana
2020s 86.0% 16.8% 69.2% Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Ghana or Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
Ghana, at 86.0% against 16.9% in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Ghana and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
69.1%, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Ghana and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
Ghana ranks 25th and Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 23rd of 253 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/ghana/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/ghana/oceania-exc-australia-and-new-zealand/">Ghana vs Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
277 places, 7,202 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed