Ghana vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Ghana
86.0%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
85.1%
in 2025
Ghana rank
24th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Ghana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 86.0% against 85.1% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 222 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.4% | 77.3% | 8.1% | Ghana |
| 2010s | 86.0% | 83.6% | 2.4% | Ghana |
| 2020s | 86.0% | 85.1% | 0.9% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Ghana or Zimbabwe?
- Ghana, at 86.0% against 85.1% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 0.9%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Ghana ranks 24th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.