Guinea vs Malawi: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Guinea
71.3%
in 2025
Malawi
71.4%
in 2025
Guinea rank
51st
Malawi rank
50th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Guinea
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 71.4% against 71.3% in Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Guinea ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 50th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.4% | 68.2% | 2.2% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 71.3% | 69.2% | 2.1% | Guinea |
| 2020s | 71.3% | 71.4% | 0.1% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Guinea or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 71.4% against 71.3% in Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Guinea and Malawi?
- 0.1%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Guinea and Malawi rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Guinea ranks 51st and Malawi ranks 50th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.