Hungary vs Zimbabwe: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Hungary
84.1%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
85.1%
in 2025
Hungary rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Hungary
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 85.1% against 84.1% in Hungary, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Hungary ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.8% | 77.3% | 9.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 84.1% | 83.6% | 0.5% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 84.1% | 85.1% | 1.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Hungary or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 85.1% against 84.1% in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 1.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Zimbabwe rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Hungary ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.