Iceland vs Israel: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Iceland
19.6%
in 2025
Israel
19.6%
in 2025
Iceland rank
185th
Israel rank
186th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Iceland
- Israel
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 19.6% against 19.6% in Israel, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 185th and Israel ranks 186th of 222 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.8% | 12.2% | 1.6% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 16.6% | 1.3% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 19.4% | 19.1% | 0.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Iceland or Israel?
- Iceland, at 19.6% against 19.6% in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Iceland and Israel?
- 0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Israel?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Israel rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Iceland ranks 185th and Israel ranks 186th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.