Iceland vs Sudan: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Iceland
19.6%
in 2025
Sudan
17.8%
in 2025
Iceland rank
185th
Sudan rank
189th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Iceland
- Sudan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 19.6% against 17.8% in Sudan, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 185th and Sudan ranks 189th of 222 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.8% | 9.1% | 4.7% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 12.6% | 5.3% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 19.4% | 17.8% | 1.6% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Iceland or Sudan?
- Iceland, at 19.6% against 17.8% in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Iceland and Sudan?
- 1.8%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sudan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Sudan rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Iceland ranks 185th and Sudan ranks 189th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.