Japan vs Jersey: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Japan
64.8%
in 2025
Jersey
64.1%
in 2025
Japan rank
61st
Jersey rank
62nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Japan
- Jersey
How they compare
Japan currently reports 64.8% against 64.1% in Jersey, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jersey ahead.
Japan ranks 61st and Jersey ranks 62nd of 222 countries.
Jersey has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Jersey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.2% | 64.1% | 33.9% | Jersey |
| 2010s | 47.9% | 64.1% | 16.2% | Jersey |
| 2020s | 62.1% | 64.1% | 1.9% | Jersey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Japan or Jersey?
- Japan, at 64.8% against 64.1% in Jersey as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Japan and Jersey?
- 0.7%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Jersey?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Japan and Jersey rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Japan ranks 61st and Jersey ranks 62nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.