Japan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Japan
64.8%
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
65.0%
in 2025
Japan rank
69th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
68th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Japan
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 65.0% against 64.8% in Japan, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 69th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 68th of 253 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.2% | 54.9% | 24.7% | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 47.9% | 58.1% | 10.3% | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | 62.1% | 65.0% | 2.8% | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Japan or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 65.0% against 64.8% in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Japan and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.2%, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Japan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Japan ranks 69th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 68th of 253 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.