Kenya vs Serbia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Kenya
45.2%
in 2025
Serbia
45.1%
in 2025
Kenya rank
119th
Serbia rank
121st
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Kenya
- Serbia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 45.2% against 45.1% in Serbia, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 119th and Serbia ranks 121st of 222 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.5% | 17.1% | 25.5% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 44.5% | 24.0% | 20.5% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 45.2% | 40.0% | 5.2% | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Kenya or Serbia?
- Kenya, at 45.2% against 45.1% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Kenya and Serbia?
- 0.1%, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Serbia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Kenya ranks 119th and Serbia ranks 121st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.