Kenya vs Sri Lanka: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Kenya
45.2%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
45.2%
in 2025
Kenya rank
119th
Sri Lanka rank
118th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Kenya
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 45.2% against 45.2% in Kenya, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 119th and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.5% | 37.7% | 4.8% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 44.5% | 44.4% | 0.0% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 45.2% | 45.2% | 0.0% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Kenya or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 45.2% against 45.2% in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Kenya and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Sri Lanka rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Kenya ranks 119th and Sri Lanka ranks 118th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.