Kiribati vs Mexico: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Kiribati
40.0%
in 2025
Mexico
40.0%
in 2025
Kiribati rank
134th
Mexico rank
132nd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Kiribati
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 40.0% against 40.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mexico ahead.
Kiribati ranks 134th and Mexico ranks 132nd of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.0% | 25.6% | 9.6% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 40.0% | 37.2% | 2.8% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 40.0% | 39.1% | 0.9% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Kiribati or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 40.0% against 40.0% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Kiribati and Mexico?
- 0.0%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mexico?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Mexico rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Kiribati ranks 134th and Mexico ranks 132nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.