Kiribati vs Mozambique: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Kiribati
40.0%
in 2025
Mozambique
40.0%
in 2025
Kiribati rank
134th
Mozambique rank
133rd
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Kiribati
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 40.0% against 40.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.
Kiribati ranks 134th and Mozambique ranks 133rd of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.0% | 28.4% | 12.4% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 40.0% | 38.7% | 1.3% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 40.0% | 40.0% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Kiribati or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 40.0% against 40.0% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Kiribati and Mozambique?
- 0.0%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mozambique?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Mozambique rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Kiribati ranks 134th and Mozambique ranks 133rd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.