Kiribati vs Tunisia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Kiribati
40.0%
in 2025
Tunisia
40.2%
in 2025
Kiribati rank
134th
Tunisia rank
131st
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Kiribati
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 40.2% against 40.0% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.0% | 16.7% | 0.7% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 40.0% | 35.9% | 4.1% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 40.0% | 40.0% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Kiribati or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 40.2% against 40.0% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Kiribati and Tunisia?
- 0.2%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Tunisia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Kiribati ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 131st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.