Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) vs Latvia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
41.6%
in 2025
Latvia
97.3%
in 2025
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
8th
Latvia rank
9th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 97.3% against 41.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), a difference of 55.7%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.3 times Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 9th of 19 regions.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.7% | 79.0% | 45.3% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 38.6% | 97.3% | 58.7% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 41.4% | 97.3% | 55.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 97.3% against 41.6% in Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
- 55.7%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and Latvia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th and Latvia ranks 9th of 19 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.