Latvia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

Latvia
97.3%
in 2025
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
42.4%
in 2025
Latvia rank
9th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
7th

Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time

  • Latvia
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 97.3% against 42.4% in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 54.9%.

That makes Latvia's figure about 2.3 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 9th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th of 222 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 79.0% 28.6% 50.3% Latvia
2010s 97.3% 36.8% 60.5% Latvia
2020s 97.3% 42.3% 55.0% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Latvia or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Latvia, at 97.3% against 42.4% in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Latvia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
54.9%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
Latvia ranks 9th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 7th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/latvia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/latvia/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Latvia vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
263 places, 6,838 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed