Latvia vs Liechtenstein: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Latvia
97.3%
in 2025
Liechtenstein
98.5%
in 2025
Latvia rank
9th
Liechtenstein rank
8th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Latvia
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 98.5% against 97.3% in Latvia, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 9th and Liechtenstein ranks 8th of 222 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.0% | 98.5% | 19.5% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 97.3% | 98.5% | 1.2% | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 97.3% | 98.5% | 1.2% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Latvia or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 98.5% against 97.3% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Latvia and Liechtenstein?
- 1.2%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Liechtenstein?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Liechtenstein rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Latvia ranks 9th and Liechtenstein ranks 8th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.