Latvia vs Niue: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Latvia
97.3%
in 2025
Niue
95.3%
in 2025
Latvia rank
9th
Niue rank
12th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Latvia
- Niue
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 97.3% against 95.3% in Niue, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Niue ahead.
Latvia ranks 9th and Niue ranks 12th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Niue in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.0% | 95.3% | 16.3% | Niue |
| 2010s | 97.3% | 95.3% | 2.0% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 97.3% | 95.3% | 2.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Latvia or Niue?
- Latvia, at 97.3% against 95.3% in Niue as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Latvia and Niue?
- 2.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Niue?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Niue rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Latvia ranks 9th and Niue ranks 12th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.