Latvia vs South-Eastern Asia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Latvia
97.3%
in 2025
South-Eastern Asia
36.9%
in 2025
Latvia rank
9th
South-Eastern Asia rank
11th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Latvia
- South-Eastern Asia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 97.3% against 36.9% in South-Eastern Asia, a difference of 60.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.6 times South-Eastern Asia's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 9th and South-Eastern Asia ranks 11th of 222 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | South-Eastern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.0% | 22.9% | 56.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 97.3% | 31.5% | 65.8% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 97.3% | 36.8% | 60.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Latvia or South-Eastern Asia?
- Latvia, at 97.3% against 36.9% in South-Eastern Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Latvia and South-Eastern Asia?
- 60.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and South-Eastern Asia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and South-Eastern Asia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Latvia ranks 9th and South-Eastern Asia ranks 11th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.