Latvia vs Timor-Leste: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Latvia
97.3%
in 2025
Timor-Leste
45.6%
in 2025
Latvia rank
9th
Timor-Leste rank
6th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Latvia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 97.3% against 45.6% in Timor-Leste, a difference of 51.7%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.1 times Timor-Leste's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 9th and Timor-Leste ranks 6th of 222 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.0% | 19.9% | 59.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 97.3% | 42.6% | 54.7% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 97.3% | 45.6% | 51.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Latvia or Timor-Leste?
- Latvia, at 97.3% against 45.6% in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Latvia and Timor-Leste?
- 51.7%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Timor-Leste?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Timor-Leste rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Latvia ranks 9th and Timor-Leste ranks 6th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.