Lithuania vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)

Lithuania
92.5%
in 2025
Small island developing States (SIDS)
29.9%
in 2025
Lithuania rank
16th
Small island developing States (SIDS) rank
13th

Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time

  • Lithuania
  • Small island developing States (SIDS)
20406080100200020122025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 92.5% against 29.9% in Small island developing States (SIDS), a difference of 62.6%.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 3.1 times Small island developing States (SIDS)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 16th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 13th of 222 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Small island developing States (SIDS) Difference Ahead
2000s 66.7% 17.5% 49.1% Lithuania
2010s 85.6% 25.9% 59.7% Lithuania
2020s 90.5% 29.6% 60.9% Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Lithuania or Small island developing States (SIDS)?
Lithuania, at 92.5% against 29.9% in Small island developing States (SIDS) as of 2025.
What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Lithuania and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
62.6%, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Small island developing States (SIDS)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Small island developing States (SIDS) rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
Lithuania ranks 16th and Small island developing States (SIDS) ranks 13th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs). Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/lithuania/small-island-developing-states-sids/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/average-proportion-of-terrestrial-key-biodiversity-areas-kbas-covered-by-protected-areas/lithuania/small-island-developing-states-sids/">Lithuania vs Small island developing States (SIDS): Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
263 places, 6,838 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed