Malawi vs Slovenia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Malawi
71.4%
in 2025
Slovenia
73.7%
in 2025
Malawi rank
50th
Slovenia rank
48th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Malawi
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 73.7% against 71.4% in Malawi, a difference of 2.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 50th and Slovenia ranks 48th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.2% | 49.2% | 19.1% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 69.2% | 72.6% | 3.5% | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 71.4% | 73.7% | 2.4% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Malawi or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 73.7% against 71.4% in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Malawi and Slovenia?
- 2.3%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Malawi ranks 50th and Slovenia ranks 48th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.