New Caledonia vs Serbia: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
New Caledonia
43.6%
in 2025
Serbia
45.1%
in 2025
New Caledonia rank
124th
Serbia rank
121st
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- New Caledonia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 45.1% against 43.6% in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 124th and Serbia ranks 121st of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.6% | 17.1% | 8.4% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 35.4% | 24.0% | 11.3% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 43.6% | 40.0% | 3.6% | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), New Caledonia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 45.1% against 43.6% in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 1.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do New Caledonia and Serbia rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- New Caledonia ranks 124th and Serbia ranks 121st of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.