Norway vs Pitcairn: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs)
Norway
56.9%
in 2025
Pitcairn
57.2%
in 2025
Norway rank
86th
Pitcairn rank
85th
Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) over time
- Norway
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 57.2% against 56.9% in Norway, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 86th and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 222 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Pitcairn in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.8% | 16.3% | 31.5% | Norway |
| 2010s | 54.1% | 32.7% | 21.5% | Norway |
| 2020s | 56.9% | 57.2% | 0.3% | Pitcairn |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas), Norway or Pitcairn?
- Pitcairn, at 57.2% against 56.9% in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas) between Norway and Pitcairn?
- 0.3%, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Pitcairn?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Norway and Pitcairn rank globally for average proportion of terrestrial key biodiversity areas (kbas)?
- Norway ranks 86th and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.